Legal Opinion
Cellular Radio Corp. v. OKI America, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1995No. 93-CV-1602PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant, Cellular Radio Corp., and appel-lee, OKI America, arbitrated a commercial dispute. After OKI prevailed, Cellular applied for an order vacating the arbitral award on the ground that two of the arbitrators displayed evident partiality and that the award was procured by corruption. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court entered an order confirming the award. Because the record does not contain any evidence of evident partiality or corruption, we affirm.
I
In April 1989, the parties entered into an agreement to cooperate in developing and testing a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Barcon Associates, Inc. v. Tri-County Asphalt Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Tretina Printing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re Arbitration Between J. P. Stevens & Co. & Rytex Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Affordable Elegance Travel, Inc. v. Worldspan, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bopp v. BramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kinn v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.