Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 185.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAZER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer,
1999-Ohio-156.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension—Continuing multiple employment if independent professional judgment on behalf of a client is likely to be adversely affected by representation of another client— Representing two or more clients in the making of an aggregate settlement of the claims of or against those clients—Previous violation of a comparable Disciplinary Rule. (No. 98-2659—Submitted May 4,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. PodorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. WestmeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. EwingOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. NewmanOhio Supreme Court · 2004