Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ewing

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1992No. 91-1767PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Charles W. Ewing is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. We suspend the execution of this discipline on condition that Ewing not be found in violation of any Disciplinary Rule for three years. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. EwingOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. PheilsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Okuley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API