Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Podor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1995No. 94-2648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We have reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that respondent complete a two-year monitored probation as set forth by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. PodorOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. PodorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. PodorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API