Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1996No. 96-985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the suspension stayed on condition that respondent attend a minimum of six hours of Continuing Legal Education classes dealing with law office management in addition to his normal CLE obligation, and that he be on probation with the local bar association for a year or until the condition is met, whichever is longer. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Stratton, J.,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dayton Bar Assn. v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API