Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
— This premises liability action was brought on behalf of a small child who was seriously injured when he slid down a steep embankment and into a fast-flowing creek adjacent to the play area near his home. The trial court dismissed the action on summary judgment, ruling as a matter of law that a landowner has no duty to protect an invitee from dangers inherent in a natural body of water.
We granted direct review and reverse. We hold that a landowner is not exempt from the duty to exercise reasonable care to protect invitees against potentially dangerous conditions on the land solely because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.