Legal Opinion

Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1996No. 62312-1PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— This premises liability action was brought on behalf of a small child who was seriously injured when he slid down a steep embankment and into a fast-flowing creek adjacent to the play area near his home. The trial court dismissed the action on summary judgment, ruling as a matter of law that a landowner has no duty to protect an invitee from dangers inherent in a natural body of water.

We granted direct review and reverse. We hold that a landowner is not exempt from the duty to exercise reasonable care to protect invitees against potentially dangerous conditions on the land solely because…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API