Somerfield v. Land & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Cowley district court; Carroll. L. Swarts, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
Whether or not an' open canal, about fifty feet wide with perpendicular banks about thirteen feet high and carrying a stream of water from six to eight feet deep, operated through the corporate limits of a populous city for commercial purposes, is an attractive nuisance, is the sole question presented for decision in this case.
The appellant, The Land & Power Company, operates through the corporate limits of Arkansas City a canal such as above described. During December, 1912, Charles Somerfield, a boy about three years of age, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Tavis v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- City of Kansas City v. SieseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Wilson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
3Cited by19 opinions
- McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Orr Ditch & Water Co. v. Justice Court of Reno TownshipNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Mindeman v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Zagar ex rel. Zagar v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.