Legal Opinion

Somerfield v. Land & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1915No. 19,135PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Carroll. L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Whether or not an' open canal, about fifty feet wide with perpendicular banks about thirteen feet high and carrying a stream of water from six to eight feet deep, operated through the corporate limits of a populous city for commercial purposes, is an attractive nuisance, is the sole question presented for decision in this case.

The appellant, The Land & Power Company, operates through the corporate limits of Arkansas City a canal such as above described. During December, 1912, Charles Somerfield, a boy about three years of age, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Price v. Atchison Water Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Tavis v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. City of Kansas City v. SieseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Wilson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Orr Ditch & Water Co. v. Justice Court of Reno TownshipNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  3. McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Mindeman v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Zagar ex rel. Zagar v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API