Legal Opinion
Sallee v. Joyner
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 23, 1999No. 2:98CV1167PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a federal inmate, brings this pro se action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), to redress an alleged violation of his constitutional rights.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 24, 1998, the court dismissed plaintiffs complaint due to his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies available at F.C.I. Petersburg. The court informed plaintiff that F.C.I. Peters-burg’s refusal to award monetary damages through the inmate grievance process does not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Alexander v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Harlan Clement Gibbs 19446039 v. Bureau of Prison OfficeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Langford v. CouchDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Johnson v. GarraghtyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Graham v. County of Gloucester, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- United States v. AliDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Feliciano v. Servicios CorreccionalesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.