Legal Opinion

Horany v. Treese

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1923No. 12185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

This is an action on a check given by defendants to plaintiffs in the sum of $1,000. The defendants answered that the consideration failed in that it was given for the assignment of a lease on certain real estate in the town of Cushing which was never executed nor delivered. Issue was joined on the defendants’ answer and the defendants assumed the burden of proof. The evidence wholly failed to sustain the allegations of the answer, but the court, after making findings of fact and law/ directed a verdict for the defendants upon the ground that the contract was in violation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huber v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Doxy v. Exchange Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Wright v. McKitrickCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  4. Barteldes Seed Co. v. Border Queen Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Fue v. People's Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Calumet v. RodgersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Robey v. Plain City Theatre Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Shull v. BantaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API