Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Calumet v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1928No. 17765PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, C.

The plaintiff in error, who is plaintiff below, brings this action against the defendant to recover on a note in the sum of $1,944, dated December 6, 1923. The only material defense alleged in defendant’s answer was want of consideration.

The evidence shows that in May, 1918, L. B. Myers, president of the First National Bank of El Reno, Leslie Thompson, cashier of the Calumet State Bank, and the defendant, were interested in an oil company known as the Triumph Oil & Development Company ; that the defendant and Leslie Thompson lived at Calumet, and the said Myers resided at El Reno;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Poteau v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Sawyer v. BahnsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Doxy v. Exchange Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of HealdtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Fue v. People's Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fenner v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Shull v. BantaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Wright v. GrabelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API