Legal Opinion

Fue v. People's Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 28, 1916No. 6259PublishedCited by 4 opinions

(Syllabus by Hooker. C.) Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. MoCain, Judge. Action by the People’s Bank & Trust Company against Ida Fue and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Ida Fue brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

From an examination of the record in this case, it appears that one L. F. Fue, who was the husband of the plaintiff in error, Ida Fue, in 1908 conveyed certain real estate to plaintiff bank ahd in December, 1909, by an agreement made between the bank and the said L. F. Fue, said real estate was reconveyed to him by the bank for the consideration of $1,500 evi denced by the joint note of the plaintiff in error and two others. This note was renewed several times, and the bank instituted a suit upon the note to collect against Ida Fue and two others, but the action was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. First National Bank of Nephi v. FooteUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Willoughby v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Doxy v. Exchange Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Page v. Geiser Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. State Ex Rel. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. First Nat. Bank of Calumet v. RodgersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Horany v. TreeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Shull v. BantaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API