Legal Opinion

Wright v. McKitrick

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 14, 1896No. 92PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Ellsworth district court; W. G. Eastland, judge. Action on a promissory note by George F. Wright against Edward MeKi trick. Judgment f.or defendant. Plaintiff brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gab,ver, J. ;

This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, on a note executed by the defendant, McKitrick, in favor of the plaintiff. The defense set up was want of consideration. The note was given to the plaintiff for another note held by him for the same amount against J. T. McKitrick, father of the defendant, and which J. T. McKitrick had executed on account of professional services rendered by the plaintiff, as a physician, in attendance upon Mrs. Ben Fowle in her last sickness. After her death, her father, J. T. McKitrick,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mulholland v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Foster v. M. A. Metts & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Sullivan v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Hiatt v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. Harris v. CassadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doxy v. Exchange Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Falk v. SalarioSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Linton v. Chestnutt-Gibbons Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Neylon v. Liberty Nat. Bank of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Hudson-Houston Lbr. Co. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API