Legal Opinion
Curiskis v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 2007No. A06-982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
On appeal from a summary judgment for the city in this special-assessment dispute, pro se appellant argues that the district court miscalculated the filing deadline for challenging a special assessment when it ruled that appellant’s appeal was untimely and, therefore, the district court lacked jurisdiction to address the challenge. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
On April 19, 2005, the City of Minneapolis sent notice of a public hearing, to be held May 3, 2005, to residents regarding the Bryn Mawr renovation project. The street reconstruction project included new curbs,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Life Rehab Services, Inc. v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013