Legal Opinion

Shortridge v. Daubney

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1987No. C1-86-1428, CX-86-1430PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

In 1986, respondents brought a summary judgment motion challenging the validity of a notice of hearing issued by the City of Maplewood prior to a special assessment hearing held in 1981. The trial court determined that the city’s notice of hearing was defective because it erroneously stated that appeals from the assessment must be brought within twenty (20) days after the adoption of the assessment rather than the thirty (30) days allowed under the statute. The court ruled that the defective notice deprived the city of jurisdiction to levy the assessment and that laches…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Green v. City of CascadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shortridge v. DaubneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Shortridge v. DaubneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API