Legal Opinion
Nasca v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 13, 2000No. 99CA0510PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
In an action to vacate an arbitration award, defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), appeals from an order granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Todd Nasca. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.
Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident and settled his personal injury claim with the insurance carrier for the other driver. Plaintiff then requested additional compensation from his own insurer, State Farm. This claim was based upon the under-insured/uninsured motorist coverage provisions of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Forsythe International, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,863 A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. William F. McCollough Jeanene McCollough Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BFN-GREELEY, LLC v. Adair Group, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bush v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Damrow v. MurdochNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
- Peak Billing v. Mountain Sleep DiagnosticsColorado Court of Appeals · 2020