Legal Opinion

K. Lundeen Corp. v. Barlow

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1932No. Docket No. 7078PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN, J., pro tem.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover for broker’s commissions upon the exchange of real estate. Defendant had judgment below and plaintiff appeals. The cause of action as alleged in the complaint is based upon the terms of a certain exchange agreement entered into between defendant and one Jacobberger, and the commission claimed is that fixed in this agreement. The answer sets up the exchange agreement in Jiaeo verba and then alleges fraud on the part of Jacobberger as to the terms of the mortgage upon the property he sought to exchange. There are also alleged in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mooney v. CyriacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Jennings v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Stanton v. CarnahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Brion v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Darrow v. HoulihanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Allen (In Re Universal Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1986
  2. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Ira Garson Realty Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Mitchell v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Weber v. DobynsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API