Legal Opinion

Brion v. Cahill

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1917No. Civ. No. 1957PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of . one thousand dollars alleged to be due to plaintiff under a contract between one Sam Krummes and the defendant Patrick Cahill, embodying the terms of a proposed exchange of real estate. One of the provisions of this contract was that the defendant Patrick Cahill would pay to the plaintiff said amount for “services rendered”—the services referred to being evidently those rendered by the plaintiff in bringing about the proposed agreement of exchange. Judgment went in favor of plaintiff against Patrick Cahill and in favor of defendant Sumner Cahill…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jennings v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. K. Lundeen Corp. v. BarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Ira Garson Realty Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Lind v. HueneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API