Jennings v. Jordan
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Dunn, White & Aiken, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This action was 'brought to recover $1,825 alleged to have been earned- by Herman Eppinger, Jr., the assignor o-f the plaintiff, as a commission upon a proposed exchange of certain lands-. Judgment went for defendant, and the plaintiff prosecutes- this appeal therefrom -and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
On the second day of May, 1914, John Fletcher and the defendant entered into a written. contract, under the terms of which Fletcher was to convey to the defendant some 333 acres of land, to be chosen hy the defendant from a certain described larger tract of 436 acres in Tuba…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roche v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hohenshell v. South Riverside Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Dyar v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Goodrich v. TurneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- K. Lundeen Corp. v. BarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Brion v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.