Taino Lines, Inc. v. M/V Constance Pan Atlantic
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, defendant-appellant Curtis Shipping, Inc. (“Curtis”) challenges the district court’s award, without a hearing, of full custodia legis expenses to plaintiffappellee Taino Lines, Inc. (“Taino”) for certain expenditures made by Taino as substitute custodian of defendant in rem the M/V Constance Pan Atlantic (“the vessel”). Finding no error in the district court’s ruling, we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
Because the weakness of Curtis’s arguments becomes more apparent with a fuller understanding of the convoluted history of this litigation, we set forth the relevant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. World University Inc., Santa Barbara Center CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- NAACP, Detroit Branch v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ferrofluidics Corporation v. Advanced Vacuum Components, inc.s.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Associated Metals and Minerals Corp. v. Alexander's Unity MVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Andrew Tempelman and Priscilla Tempelman v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- (HC) Zambrano v. WolfDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Bornstein Seafoods Inc v. City of BellinghamDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.