Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School Committee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Roland and Miriam M. reside in Concord, Massachusetts, with Matthew M., their 15-year-old son. Matthew is “handicapped” within the meaning of the Education of the Handicapped Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1485 (1982 & Supp. V 1987) (the Act). When a controversy arose over his educational course, the Bureau of Special Education Appeals (BSEA), an adjunct of the Massachusetts Department of Education (MassEd), ruled that the Concord School Committee (Concord) had offered Matthew an appropriate education, but ordered the parents reimbursed for certain interim…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Correa v. Hospital San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- R.E. Ex Rel. J.E. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Carlisle Area School v. Scott P., by and Through His Guardians, Bess P. And Richard E. P., in No. 94-7520. Carlisle Area School District, in No. 94-7539 v. Scott P., by and Through His Guardians, Bess P. And Richard E. PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Diaz-Fonseca v. Commonwealth of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Amanda J., a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Annette J. v. Clark County School District, and Nevada State Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.