Legal Opinion

(HC) Zambrano v. Wolf

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 26, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00595Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCIAL BRAVO ZAMBRANO, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00595-DAD-JLT 12 Petitioners, 13 v. ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS TO PETITIONERS VILLALOBOS AND 14 CHAD F. WOLF, et al., SPITZAUER, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DUE TO LACK OF JURISDICITON 15 Respondents. (Doc. No. 1) 16 17 18 19 Pending before the court is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 2241 filed on behalf of petitioners Jorge Villalobos and Michael Spitzauer (“petitioners”). 21 (Doc. No. 1)1 The petition is based upon the risks…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hernandez v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Harrison v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Taino Lines, Inc. v. M/V Constance Pan AtlanticCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API