Legal Opinion
Bornstein Seafoods Inc v. City of Bellingham
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 14, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00022Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 BORNSTEIN SEAFOODS, INC., CASE NO. C21-0022JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PORT OF v. BELLINGHAM’S MOTION TO 12 DISMISS CITY OF BELLINGHAM, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendant the Port of Bellingham’s (“Port”) motion to dismiss 17 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). (Mot. (Dkt. # 18); see also Reply 18 (Dkt. # 30).) Plaintiff Bornstein Seafoods, Inc. (“Bornstein”) opposes the motion and 19 moves to strike portions of the Port’s reply. (Resp.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- RR Street & Co. Inc. v. Transport Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.