Hilts v. Hilts
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union: Robert Eakin, Judge. Action by J. M. Hilts against Rachel Hilts. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Heard on a motion to dismiss the appeal. Dismissed.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
This is a motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal because (1) the transcript was not filed in this court within *163the time required by law, or any extension by the trial court; and (2) the notice of appeal was not served upon the district attorney. This motion was argued and submitted on the first day of the term, but, reserving its decision thereon, the court subsequently heard the case upon its merits. In the .view we take of the matter, a decision upon the first ground assigned in the motion will dispose of the case.
1. By order of the trial court, made and entered November 5,1902, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Peterson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Gorham v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Reed v. Inhabitants of ActonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States National Bank v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Habighorst v. ConantOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Howe v. Federal Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Converse v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.