Legal Opinion
Howe v. Federal Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 15, 1932No. 23387PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRidey, J.
The Federal Surety Company secured a judgment against L. J. Howe in the district court. L. J. Howe has attempted to appeal to this court. He has tendered a petition in error with case-made attached, but there has not been made a deposit for costs with the clerk of this court as required by section 3036, C. O. S. 1921, as amended by chapter 102, S. L. 1927, p. 163 [O. S. 1931, sec. 3774], In lieu of such cost deposit L. J. Howe has submitted an affidavit in forma pauperis.
The question therefore occurs whether a litigant in. this court may be relieved, by reason of poverty, from compliance with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bradford v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Jeffries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hilts v. HiltsOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Mayes v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Matter of RichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Mehdipour v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Matter of EvingerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.