Legal Opinion

Union Starch & Refining Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1931No. 20119. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

Roe Whittaker applied for compensation on account of injuries he sustained on April 13, 1928, alleging that they were received in an accident that arose out of and in the course of his employment with the Union Starch and Refining Company. A hearing was had before an arbitrator, who made an award finding that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment, that respondent was entitled to compensation at the rate of $15.26 per week for a period of 28-4/7 weeks for temporary incapacity, and to additional compensation at the same rate for the further period of 95 weeks for fifty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Board of Education v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Weis Paper Mill Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Kary v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Mt. Olive & Staunton Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rodman v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Calvert v. Illinois Power & Light Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API