Legal Opinion

Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1917No. 10966PublishedCited by 109 opinions

Writ oe Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar M. Torrison, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Carter

Guiseppe Cappucio, while in the employ of plaintiff in error on July 15, 1914, sustained a serious injury to his right hand, for which he filed a claim before the Industrial Board. Upon hearing before the committee of arbitration an award was entered in his favor. On petition for review filed by plaintiff in error, the Industrial Board, without the introduction of additional evidence, entered an award in Cappucio’s favor, requiring plaintiff in error to pay him five dollars a week for 112 weeks. The case was duly taken by certiorari to the circuit court of Cook county, which, after a hearing,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Bell v. Hayes-Ionia Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Stagg v. Edward Westen Tea & Spice Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Brucker v. MercolaIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  4. Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API