Legal Opinion

Kary v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1937No. File No. 6462PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBure, J.

The plaintiff, a farmer, was employed by tbe county of Morton in 1935 on Project No. 88 under tbe Federal Emergency Relief Administration, tbe employees being protected by workmen’s compensation. Wben called upon be furnished bis own labor and horse power to operate a fresno, driving to bis work in a wagon. His hours were from 8 A. M. until 5 P. M., beginning with bis arrival at tbe job and ceasing wben tbe work stopped, with lunch hour off. His pay was 40c an hour for bis own work and 50c an hour for tbe horses.

Plaintiff worked under tbe supervision and direction of a foreman, and because of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Wahlig v. Krenning-Schlapp Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Harden v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SanbornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Welch v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Driessen v. SchiefelbeinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bjerke v. HeartsoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API