Rodman v. CSX Intermodal, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toomin
Here, we consider whether an employer may be vicariously hable for the negligence of an employee that occurs while the worker is en route to “punching out,” as directed by the employer. Plaintiff, Michael Rodman, was injured in a collision with an employee of defendant, CSX Intermodal, Inc., that occurred at the premises where the employee worked. The circuit court found that the employee was not acting within the scope of employment at the time of the collision and entered summary judgment for defendant. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
Adam…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Williams v. ManchesterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Adames v. SheahanIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Volling v. Antioch Rescue SquadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Garland v. Sybaris Club International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Garland v. Sybaris Club International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Lori S. Yokoyama v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Natasha Cade, on behalf of her minor son, B.C. v. Lamont Bankston, Isaac Kirkwood, and Waukegan Community Unit School District No. 60 Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026