Legal Opinion

Lakeman v. LaFrance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 1959No. 4770PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lampeón, J.

The first question transferred is the following: “In a malpractice action is the two year Statute of Limitations tolled by fraudulent concealment of facts allegedly giving rise to the cause of action?”

USA 508:4 provides that “Actions of trespass to the person, actions for malpractice, and actions for defamatory words may be brought within two years, and all other personal actions within six years, after the cause of action accrued, and not afterward.” Laws 1937, c. 21, s. 1, added actions for malpractice to the above statute which otherwise had been in substantially the same form…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Robins v. FinestoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ruth v. DightWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Smith v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API