Legal Opinion

Vandiver v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1911No. 399PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a decision of the United States Board of General Appraisers (T. D. 29442; T. D. 29644).

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Judge

The appellant, John L. Vandiver, imported certain boxes, which were classified under the provision in paragraph 459 of the tariff act of 1897 as smokers' articles. Duty was assessed at 60 per cent ad valorem. Appellant also imported certain other articles, which were classified under paragraphs 96 and 100 of the aforesaid tariff *195law as decorated china and decorated glass, respectively, and duty thereon was assessed at 60 per cent ad valorem. The importer protested, alleging that the boxes were dutiable at 35 per cent ad valorem, under paragraph 208 of the tariff act of 1897, as manufactures…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Isaacs v. JonasSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. National Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. United States v. DunhillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. MacNaughtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. Bischoff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API