Bischoff v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7810 (T. D. 35880).
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The importation was invoiced as “ cigar lighters, ” and is so referred to.
The only question in the case is one of law, and involves the consideration of the following paragraphs of the tariff aci of 1913:
356. Jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, 60 per centum ad valorem; rope, curb, cable, and fancy patterns of chain not exceeding one-half inch in diameter, width, or thickness, valued above 30 cents per yard; and articles valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Patillo v. Allen-West Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Thomas v. WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Horstmann Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Andrews & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Kresge Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Schoverling v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.