Legal Opinion

United States v. National Importing Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 21, 1924No. 2325PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The importation was described by the appraiser as — •

Moulded amber bits, anu consists of pipe bits shaped, but not bored. It was returned for duty at 60 per cent ad valorem under the provision for all smokers’ articles whatsoever, finished or unfinished, n. s. p. f., in paragraph 1454, of the act of 1922.

The importer protested and the Board of United States General Appraisers sustained the protest, and held that the importation should be classified under paragraph 11 of the tariff act of 1922, as amberoid unmanufactured.

The two paragraphs of the tariff act of 1922 to be considered are as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nyman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Davis Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  3. Paramount Import Export Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Harrigan Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Lunham & Reeve, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API