Legal Opinion

United States v. MacNaughton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 28, 1913No. 1237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeab from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 32938 (T. D. 33594). .

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The determination of this appeal rests upon the construction to be given the testimony in the case, and particularly one statement made *115by the importer, who is appellee here, called as a witness in his own behalf. His testimony was brief and is as follows:

J. J. MacNaughton, called as a witness in his own behalf, being duly sworn, testified as follows:

Q.. (By Mr. Bird.) What is your business? — A. Wholesale lumber.

Q. You are the importer of white-oak piles protested against in this case? — A. Yes. * * *

Q. Let us have the facts. — A. They are rough unmanufactured timber; they come in just as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Hartranft v. LangfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. HempsteadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amitt Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Holdwire, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Keller Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. De Vahni International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API