People v. Valencia
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant was charged by an information in two counts with the offense of statutory rape. At the time of the trial the prosecutrix testified that she did not have sexual intercourse with the defendant on the day of June 13, 1926, as alleged in the second count, and for that reason it was dismissed. She did, however, testify that the offense charged in the first count was committed on June 6, 1926. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on this count and the defendant appeals from the judgment pronounced thereon and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
While put by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. ZarateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1941