State v. Jones

(Dissenting) — Conceding the trial court should allow a liberal cross-examination of the prosecutrix in this class of cases as to any relevant, pertinent and connected circumstances which might modify, explain, contradict, rebut or make clear the examination in chief, such cross examination is not to be unlimited in scope. (People v. Burnette, (Cal.) 102 Pac. 799.)

Appellant does not by his argument or analysis show how any testimony which might have been given in response to the questions on cross examination to which objections were sustained would have enlightened the jury on any material…