Legal Opinion

People v. Madden

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1981No. Crim. No. 4097PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOPPER, Acting P. J.

Where evidence is introduced as to several criminal acts of oral copulation, all of which occurred within a relatively short time span but an accused is not charged with a violation of all of those acts, does the trial court commit reversible error in not giving a sua sponte instruction stating that the jurors must all agree that the accused committed the same act or acts? Yes. That issue (along with other contentions) arises out of an appeal by appellants James R. Madden and Jerry Vernacchio (hereinafter respectively Madden and Vernacchio) from conviction after…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API