Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1901No. Crim. No. 626PublishedCited by 37 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

The defendant was charged in the information of the crime of an assault with intent to commit rape, and upon (trial was convicted. He appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. It is contended that the evidence fails to show that defendant made the assault with the intent to commit rape, but that his intention was to gratify an unnatural desire, which is not a crime under the statute. The evidence shows that the .defendant enticed two little girls (one aged twelve years, the age of the other not appearing in the record) into his room, unbuttoned the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CourierMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. LandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. SwalmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. BowenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API