Legal Opinion

Havice v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 1986No. WCB 83-08177 & WCB 83-08027; CA A36250PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, P. J., Pro Tempore

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order which reversed the referee’s decision that his low back condition was compensable as an aggravation. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Claimant worked for employer for 18 months in 1977 and 1978. In early August, 1978, while operating a sanding machine, he suffered severe back pain which forced him to miss four days of work. Later that month, he again suffered low back pain, as well as pain and swelling in the joints of his hands. Claimant was examined by Dr. Jefferson on August 18, 1978, and again on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wacker Siltronic Corp. v. SatcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Clarke v. Little W LoggingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. SalyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API