Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Grable

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1981No. CA 16671, SC 27174PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the employer is required to pay benefits to a claimant for worsening of the worker’s condition where the worsening is the result of both an original compensable back injury and a subsequent off-the-job back injury.

Background

The claimant suffered a back injury on February 21, 1978, while lifting heavy blocks of wood in his employer’s mill. His claim under the workers’ compensation law was accepted by the employer. He was released by his treating doctor for light work on April 3,1978, and for full duty on May 8,1978. That doctor was of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Larsen v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Draughon v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill LumberOregon Supreme Court · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API