Legal Opinion

Wacker Siltronic Corp. v. Satcher

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 1988No. WCB No. 85-07300; CA A41482PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Employer seeks review of a Worker’s Compensation Board Order which affirmed the referee’s order setting aside employer’s denial of the claim and awarded a 25% penalty and attorney fees for late denial. Claimant cross-petitions and. seeks review of that portion of the Board order which affirmed the referee’s finding that the denial was reasonable. On de novo review, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

The first issue is whether claimant sustained a work-related injury. Employer argues that he did not. The referee found that claimant strained his lower back on February 15, 1985, in an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spivey v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Havice v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Matter of Compensation of CondonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. EBI Companies v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Whitman v. Industrial Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Williams v. SAIF Corp. (In re Williams)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API