Kahn v. Canfield
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Petitioners (hereafter referred to by their trial role as plaintiffs), who prevailed against respondents (hereafter defendants) both at trial and in the Court of Appeals in an underlying action for fraud, breach of contract, ORICO, and other statutory violations, seek $15,065.89 1 in attorney fees for their efforts in filing a response to defendants’ petition for review by this court. Plaintiffs claim entitlement to those fees under three statutes: ORS 166.725(7)(a) (1993) (providing an action and authorizing an award of “reasonably incurred” attorney fees to any person injured by a violation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dockins v. State Farm Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of PolacekOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Lehman v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.