In Re the Marriage of Polacek
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
This matter is before the court on the petition of respondent on review (mother) for an award of attorney fees for her lawyer’s services in opposing father’s petition for review in this court. Father has filed objections. For the reasons set out below, we deny the petition.
Father and mother were married and had three children, but separated in 2005. In 2006, the parties stipulated to a judgment dissolving their marriage and awarding sole custody of the children to mother. One year after entry of the judgment, father filed a motion under ORS 107.135(l)(a) to modify the judgment. 1 The trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Central PointOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Lehman v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. WallaceOregon Supreme Court · 2024
- DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hospital at StanfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Mikityuk v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.