Lehman v. Bradbury

In Lehman v. Bradbury, 333 Or 231, 233, 37 P3d 989 (2002), plaintiffs — two former state representatives and two voters, one from each of the former representatives’ districts — brought an action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act and ORS 246.910(1) challenging the validity of Ballot Measure 3 (1992), the “Term Limits Initiative.” Plaintiffs prevailed and now seek a joint and several award of $35,532 in appellate attorney fees against defendant and intervenors. Intervenors, but not defendant, filed objections. For the reasons set out below, we conclude that plaintiffs are entitled to…