Legal Opinion
Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement Board
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 2007No. SC S50593; S50645; S50686PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.
This matter is before the court on three separate petitions for attorney fee awards. In Strunk v. PERB, 338 Or 145, 108 P3d 1058 (2005) (Strunk I), petitioners successfully challenged certain aspects of the legislature’s 2003 revision of the Public Employee Retirement System (PERS). Respondents there and in the matter now before us are the State of Oregon, the Public Employees Retirement Board, and a variety of nonstate government entities that include several different school districts, the City of Salem, Deschutes County, the League of Oregon Cities, and the Oregon School Boards…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders, and Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Specthrie & Lerach Molloy, Jones & Donahue, P.C. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Lawrence Laub v. Continental Assurance Company v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Continental Assurance Company v. Berger & Montague, P.A. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Bala v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Gessele v. Jack In The Box Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.