Legal Opinion
Palm Springs Paint Co. v. Arenas
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 1966No. Civ. 7703PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.
Plaintiff, Palm Springs Paint Company, brought this action against defendant Richard Arenas, a member of the Agua Caliente tribe of Mission Indians, and the Security First National Bank, guardian of his estate, for declaratory relief and breach of an agreement, hereafter referred to as the “side agreement,” executed by Arenas contemporaneously with the execution of a five-year lease of restricted Indian land in Palm Springs. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants.
Plaintiff is a corporation whose stock is wholly owned by Laurie and Edna Sheklow. In September 1955, with the written…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Swaffield v. Universal Ecsco Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- First N.B.S. Corp. v. GabrielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Nelsen v. Workmen's Compesation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Medak v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Causey v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.