Legal Opinion
Causey v. Board of Pension Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1984No. Civ. 67436PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AMERIAN, J.-
Facts
Appellant Vance D. Causey (herein appellant) was a police officer of the City of Los Angeles for 18 years. He sought a disability pension in 1978 because of depression and hypertension he claimed was work related and due to duty pressures. At the same time he also sought workers’ compensation benefits because of the same condition.
In an undated stipulation filed February 1, 1983, in the workers’ compensation matter, the City of Los Angeles, the employer of appellant, conceded that the disability was job related and on February 1, 1983, an award was signed and filed by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Jackson v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Dakins v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Palm Springs Paint Co. v. ArenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
3Cited by2 opinions
- First N.B.S. Corp. v. GabrielsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Happy Nails & Spa v. SuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013