Legal Opinion

FAIRCHILD, PROSECUTING ATTY., ETC. v. Schanke

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1953No. 29,050PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was brought by appellees to enjoin appellants, as law enforcing officers, from enforcing any of the provisions of ch. 147 of the Acts of 1953, and as grounds therefor they allege that said act is unconstitutional and void.

Appellees, plaintiffs herein, are engaged in the business of printing and manufacturing and own valuable machinery, appliances, equipment and other personal property consisting generally of printing presses, paper cutters, folding and printing machines, tools, office furniture, paper and cardboard stocks and other supplies which are subject to being destroyed if…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wright-Bachman, Inc. v. HODNETTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Welsh, Governor v. SellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API