Legal Opinion

Springfield Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Springfield

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 7, 1921No. 46PublishedCited by 56 opinions

EEEOE TO THE SUPBEME COUET OP THE-STATE OP ILLINOIS. The plaintiff in error brought this suit in a circuit court of Illinois to enjoin the City of Springfield from operating its plant for the production and sale of electricity to private consumers without having first filed rates, etc., as required by the Public Utilities Act of the State (Laws 1913, p. 459). A decree dismissing the bill was ultimately affirmed by the state Supreme Court, whose decision is brought here by…

Read the full summary

EEEOE TO THE SUPBEME COUET OP THE-STATE OP ILLINOIS. The plaintiff in error brought this suit in a circuit court of Illinois to enjoin the City of Springfield from operating its plant for the production and sale of electricity to private consumers without having first filed rates, etc., as required by the Public Utilities Act of the State (Laws 1913, p. 459). A decree dismissing the bill was ultimately affirmed by the state Supreme Court, whose decision is brought here by the present writ of error. A municipal corporation which supplies its inhabitants with electricity, gas or water, does so…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a bill in equity brought by the plaintiff in error, a private gas and electric company, to restrain the defendant City from producing and selling electricity To private consumers without first filing schedules of rates and printing and posting the same as required by §§ 33, 34 of the Public Utilities Act of June 30, 1913. [Laws 1913, p. 459.] The bill was dismissed on demurrer by the Court of first instance. An appeal was taken to the Supreme Court where the decree was affirmed on rehearing, after a previous decision the other way. The Public Utilities Act and the Municipal Ownership…

2Cited by56 opinions

  1. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API