Legal Opinion

Williams v. McConaughey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1899No. 8928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Hamilton county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This was replevin by Y. W. Williams to recover a stock of merchandise seized by the defendant, as sheriff, under certain writs of attachment issued in favor of the cred*657itors of Thomas Upton. The verdict was for the defendant, and to reverse the judgment entered thereon is the purpose of this proceeding. There was evidence introduced on behalf of plaintiff tending to show that he was engaged in the mercantile business at the town of Brornfield, and on July 7, 1893, being the owner of the stock of goods in controversy, sold the same to his brother-in-law, Thomas Upton, for $1,213.08; that of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Carson v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Frederick v. KinzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Richardson v. HalsteadNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. W. Sanders Cotton Mill, Inc. v. MoodyMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Peterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Reed v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API