Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Kinzer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court of Richardson county. Tried below before Broady, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

On the trial in the court below, the court of its own motion instructed the jury as follows:

“In order to find that Peter Frederick is one of the makers of the note you must find either that he signed his name thereto or authorized some one to sign his name thereto, or since his name was signed thereto, ratified the act as his own.”

The defendant prayed the court to give the following instruction:

“The jury are instructed that Kinzer cannot recover in this action unless it has been proved by the preponderance *367of the evidence either that Peter Frederick did sign the note or that it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Iron Mountain Bank v. MurdockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Great Falls Street Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dayton v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Holt v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Williams v. McConaugheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Muller v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API